The Notion of a Health Good in China and Elsewhere

Abstract : Is the intervention of the state in the healthcare market legitimate and efficient? To answer this question, a clear definition of a health good and its implications is needed. Can we just apply the general definition of a public good for all health goods? Should we consider different types of health goods? If yes, how do we delimit the frontier between a public good and a private good? With a rapid glance at the diversity of organizations in the healthcare system that exist in the world, it appears there is little consensus on what can and should be defined as a public good. Generally speaking, all countries have a mixed health system, combining pro-market elements with welfare state safeguards, and China is no exception: all reforms of the healthcare system implemented since the 1980s have swung between both. To understand the Chinese health system and its recent evolution, we need to start by defining the global framework in which the “health good” is set.
Document type :
Book sections
Complete list of metadatas

https://hal-pjse.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01785767
Contributor : Caroline Bauer <>
Submitted on : Friday, May 4, 2018 - 3:31:17 PM
Last modification on : Monday, January 28, 2019 - 1:50:06 PM

Identifiers

  • HAL Id : hal-01785767, version 1

Collections

Citation

Carine Milcent. The Notion of a Health Good in China and Elsewhere. Health Reform in China: From Violence To Digital Healthcare, Palgrave Mac Millan, pp.15-33, 2018, 978-3-319-69736. ⟨hal-01785767⟩

Share

Metrics

Record views

115