Agglomeration and welfare: The core-periphery model in the light of Bentham, Kaldor, and Rawls

Abstract : The objective of this paper is to apply different welfare approaches to the canonical model developed by Krugman, with the aim of comparing the only two possible market outcomes, i.e. agglomeration and dispersion. More precisely, we use the potential Pareto improvement criteria, as well as the utilitarian and Rawlsian welfare functions. No clear answer emerges for the following two reasons: (i) in general, there is indetermination when compensation schemes are used and (ii) the best outcome heavily depends on societal values regarding inequalities across individuals. However, simulations undertaken for plausible values of the main parameters suggest that there might be excessive agglomeration.
Type de document :
Article dans une revue
Journal of Public Economics, Elsevier, 2006, 90 (1-2), pp.325-347. 〈10.1016/j.jpubeco.2004.12.002〉
Liste complète des métadonnées

https://hal-pjse.archives-ouvertes.fr/halshs-00754181
Contributeur : Caroline Bauer <>
Soumis le : mardi 20 novembre 2012 - 08:47:39
Dernière modification le : mercredi 13 décembre 2017 - 14:20:29

Identifiants

Collections

Citation

Sylvie Charlot, Carl Gaigné, Frédéric Robert-Nicoud, Jacques-François Thisse. Agglomeration and welfare: The core-periphery model in the light of Bentham, Kaldor, and Rawls. Journal of Public Economics, Elsevier, 2006, 90 (1-2), pp.325-347. 〈10.1016/j.jpubeco.2004.12.002〉. 〈halshs-00754181〉

Partager

Métriques

Consultations de la notice

168