R. , « Survey of obstetricians'personal preference for discretionary practice, Journal of Obstetrics and gynecology, vol.73, p.4

G. Badeyan, M. Wcislo, E. Bussière, A. Lordier, and . Et, La situation périnatale en France en 998 », études et Résultats, vol.73, 2000.

B. Baille, Journal de gynécologie et obstétrique et de la biologie de la reproduction, vol.24, pp.763-77

D. Baubeau and G. Et-buisson, La pratique des césariennes : évolution et variabilité entre 998 et 200 », études et Résultats, 273, drees (Ministère des Affaires sociales, 2003.

R. W. Beard, M. Jofe, J. Et-paterson, and C. , « What is the optimal caesarean section rate? An outcome based study of existing variation », Journal of epidemiology and Community health, vol.48, pp.406-410

C. Deneux-tharaux, E. Carmona, M. Bouvie-colle, and G. Bréart, Postpartum Maternal Mortality and Cesarean Delivery, vol.08, pp.54-548, 2006.

L. Kaestener, R. Et-waidman, and T. , The impact of mal practice fears on cesarean, Journal of health economics, vol.8, pp.49-522

D. Et-monfardini and C. , Style of practice and assortative mating: a recursive probit analysis of cesarean section scheduling in Italy, Applied economics, vol.40, pp.4-423, 2008.

J. Gruber, J. Kim, and D. Et-mayzlin, « Physician fees and procedure intensity: the case of cesarean delivery », Journal of health economics, vol.8, pp.473-490

J. Gruber and . Et, « Physician fnancial incentives and cesarean section delivery, Journal of economics, vol.24, pp.99-122
DOI : 10.3386/w4933

URL : https://doi.org/10.3386/w4933

F. , « Incidence des infections nosocomiales chez les accouchées césarisées et non césarisées, 2006.

, Women's health Today, Perspective on current research and clinical proctice: the proceedings of the xIv e World Congress of Gynecology and Obstetrics

I. Kenzie, « Should Women who elect to have cesarean sections pay for them?, british Medical Journal, vol.38, p.70

A. Kwee, M. Bots, G. H. Visser, and H. W. Et-bruinse, Obstetric management and outcome of pregnancy in women with a history of caesarean section in the Netherlands, Journal of Obstetrics and gynecology and Reproductive biology, vol.24, issue.2, pp.87-92, 2006.

F. , The relative risk of cesarean section (intrapartum and elective) and vaginal delivery: a detailed analysis to exclude the efects of medical disorders and other acute preexisting physiological disturbances, Journal of Obstetrics gynaecologist, vol.990, pp.883-892

M. Levy, G. , J. J. Cohen, H. Colladon, B. Maria et al., Césarienne en France : impact des facteurs organisationnels dans les variations de pratiques », vol.26, pp.484-495

I. Shelton-brown, « Physician demand for leisure: implications for cesarean sections rates, Journal of health economics, vol.5, pp.233-242

I. M. , E. M. , A. A. , G. E. , and A. H. , Placenta previa-accreta: Risk factors and complications, vol.93, pp.45-049, 2005.

A. , Les inégalités régionales de densité médicale : le rôle de la mobilité des jeunes médecins », études et Résultats, vol.30

S. Wu, M. Kocherginsky, and J. U. Et-hibbard, Abnormal placentation: Twentyyear analysis, vol.92, pp.458-504, 2005.