Who compares to whom? The anatomy of income comparisons in Europe

Abstract : This article provides unprecedented direct evidence from large-scale survey data on both the intensity (how much?) and direction (to whom?) of income comparisons. Income comparisons are considered to be at least somewhat important by three-quarters of Europeans. They are associated with both lower levels of subjective well-being and a greater demand for income redistribution. The rich compare less and are happier than average when they do, which latter is consistent with relative income theory. With respect to the direction of comparisons, colleagues are the most frequently-cited reference group. Those who compare to colleagues are happier than those who compare to other benchmarks.
Type de document :
Article dans une revue
Economic Journal, Wiley, 2010, 120 (544), pp.573-594. 〈10.1111/j.1468-0297.2010.02359.x〉
Liste complète des métadonnées

https://hal-pjse.archives-ouvertes.fr/halshs-00754447
Contributeur : Caroline Bauer <>
Soumis le : mardi 20 novembre 2012 - 09:40:48
Dernière modification le : mardi 24 avril 2018 - 17:20:14

Lien texte intégral

Identifiants

Collections

Citation

Andrew E. Clark, Claudia Senik. Who compares to whom? The anatomy of income comparisons in Europe. Economic Journal, Wiley, 2010, 120 (544), pp.573-594. 〈10.1111/j.1468-0297.2010.02359.x〉. 〈halshs-00754447〉

Partager

Métriques

Consultations de la notice

256