Who compares to whom? The anatomy of income comparisons in Europe

Abstract : This article provides unprecedented direct evidence from large-scale survey data on both the intensity (how much?) and direction (to whom?) of income comparisons. Income comparisons are considered to be at least somewhat important by three-quarters of Europeans. They are associated with both lower levels of subjective well-being and a greater demand for income redistribution. The rich compare less and are happier than average when they do, which latter is consistent with relative income theory. With respect to the direction of comparisons, colleagues are the most frequently-cited reference group. Those who compare to colleagues are happier than those who compare to other benchmarks.
Document type :
Journal articles
Complete list of metadatas

https://hal-pjse.archives-ouvertes.fr/halshs-00754447
Contributor : Caroline Bauer <>
Submitted on : Tuesday, November 20, 2012 - 9:40:48 AM
Last modification on : Saturday, March 16, 2019 - 1:51:21 AM

Links full text

Identifiers

Citation

Andrew E. Clark, Claudia Senik. Who compares to whom? The anatomy of income comparisons in Europe. Economic Journal, Wiley, 2010, 120 (544), pp.573-594. ⟨10.1111/j.1468-0297.2010.02359.x⟩. ⟨halshs-00754447⟩

Share

Metrics

Record views

333