Dots to boxes: Do the size and shape of spatial units jeopardize economic geography estimations?

Abstract : This paper evaluates, in the context of economic geography estimates, the magnitude of the distortions arising from the choice of a specific zoning system, which is also known as the Modifiable Areal Unit Problem (MAUP). We undertake three standard economic geography exercises (the analysis of spatial concentration, agglomeration economies, and trade determinants), using various French zoning systems differentiated according to the size and shape of their spatial units. While size might matter, especially when the dependent variable of a regression is not aggregated in the same way as the explanatory variables and/or the zoning system involves large spatial units, shape does so much less. In any case, both dimensions are of secondary importance compared to specification issues.
Type de document :
Article dans une revue
Journal of Urban Economics, Elsevier, 2010, 67 (3), pp.287-302. 〈10.1016/j.jue.2009.09.014〉
Liste complète des métadonnées

https://hal-pjse.archives-ouvertes.fr/halshs-00754452
Contributeur : Caroline Bauer <>
Soumis le : mardi 20 novembre 2012 - 09:41:12
Dernière modification le : mercredi 5 septembre 2018 - 14:58:13

Lien texte intégral

Identifiants

Citation

Anthony Briant, Pierre-Philippe Combes, Miren Lafourcade. Dots to boxes: Do the size and shape of spatial units jeopardize economic geography estimations?. Journal of Urban Economics, Elsevier, 2010, 67 (3), pp.287-302. 〈10.1016/j.jue.2009.09.014〉. 〈halshs-00754452〉

Partager

Métriques

Consultations de la notice

391