Abductive logics in a belief revision framework

Abstract : Abduction was first introduced in the epistemological context of scientific discovery. It was more recently analyzed in artificial intelligence, especially with respect to diagnosis analysis or ordinary reasoning. These two fields share a common view of abduction as a general process of hypotheses formation. More precisely, abduction is conceived as a kind of reverse explanation where a hypothesis H can be abduced from events E if H is a "good explanation" of E. The paper surveys four known schemes for abduction that can be used in both fields. Its first contribution is a taxonomy of these schemes according to a common semantic framework based on belief revision. Its second contribution is to produce, for each non-trivial scheme, a representation theorem linking its semantic framework to a set of postulates. Its third contribution is to present semantic and axiomatic arguments in favor of one of these schemes, "ordered abduction," which has never been vindicated in the literature.
Document type :
Journal articles
Complete list of metadatas

https://hal-pjse.archives-ouvertes.fr/halshs-00754617
Contributor : Caroline Bauer <>
Submitted on : Tuesday, November 20, 2012 - 9:58:12 AM
Last modification on : Thursday, February 7, 2019 - 4:13:35 PM

Links full text

Identifiers

Citation

Bernard Walliser, Denis Zwirn, Hervé Zwirn. Abductive logics in a belief revision framework. Journal of Logic, Language and Information, Springer Verlag, 2005, 14 (1), pp.87-117. ⟨10.1007/s10849-005-2319-7⟩. ⟨halshs-00754617⟩

Share

Metrics

Record views

528