One-round vs. Two-round Elections: An Experimental Study

Abstract : The paper presents a series of experiments in which participants were invited to vote in four one-round elections and four two-round elections, with the same set of five candidates, among which three were viable and two were not. The experiments were designed to test the arguments put forward by Duverger and Cox about the propensity to vote sincerely or strategically in one-round and two-round elections. Our findings indicate little difference between the two systems. In both systems, there was a strong tendency to strategically desert the unviable candidates. The data thus support Cox over Duverger.
Document type :
Journal articles
Complete list of metadatas

https://hal-pjse.archives-ouvertes.fr/halshs-00754652
Contributor : Caroline Bauer <>
Submitted on : Tuesday, November 20, 2012 - 9:58:47 AM
Last modification on : Wednesday, July 17, 2019 - 2:00:06 PM

Identifiers

Collections

Citation

André Blais, Jean-François Laslier, Annie Laurent, Nicolas Sauger, Karine van der Straeten. One-round vs. Two-round Elections: An Experimental Study. French Politics, Palgrave Macmillan, 2007, 5 (3), pp.278-286. ⟨10.1057/palgrave.fp.8200125⟩. ⟨halshs-00754652⟩

Share

Metrics

Record views

469