From Shareholder Value to CEO Power: the Paradox of the 1990s

Abstract : Why did CEO remuneration explode during the 1990s and persist at high levels, even after the Internet bubble burst? This article surveys the alternative explanations that have been given of this paradox, mainly by various economic theories with some extension to political science, business administration, social psychology, moral philosophy and network analysis. It is argued that the diffusion of stock options and financial market-related incentives, supposed to discipline managers, have entitled them to convert their intrinsic power into remuneration and wealth, both at micro and macro level. This is the outcome of a de facto alliance of executives with financiers, who have exploited the long-run erosion of wage earners' bargaining power. The article also discusses the possible reforms that could reduce the probability and the adverse consequences of CEO and top-manager opportunism: reputation, business ethic, legal sanctions, public auditing of companies, or a shift from a shareholder to a stakeholder conception.
Type de document :
Article dans une revue
Competition and Change, Taylor & Francis, 2005, 9 (1), pp.7-47. 〈10.1179/102452905X38623〉
Liste complète des métadonnées

https://hal-pjse.archives-ouvertes.fr/halshs-00754109
Contributeur : Caroline Bauer <>
Soumis le : mardi 20 novembre 2012 - 08:43:47
Dernière modification le : mardi 24 avril 2018 - 17:20:09

Lien texte intégral

Identifiants

Collections

Citation

Robert Boyer. From Shareholder Value to CEO Power: the Paradox of the 1990s. Competition and Change, Taylor & Francis, 2005, 9 (1), pp.7-47. 〈10.1179/102452905X38623〉. 〈halshs-00754109〉

Partager

Métriques

Consultations de la notice

159